3 ms·
The technical analysis pinpointing the attack to the Chinese government was definitely not blurry. If anything the attack was pinpointed to Chinese infrastruct
by moe 12y ago
The technical analysis pinpointing the attack to the Chinese government was definitely not blurry.
If anything the attack was pinpointed to Chinese infrastructure, not the Chinese government.
TTL based tracing is very deterministic and easy to understand
It's only deterministic if you trust all hops between yourself and the target, as any of them could fake the remaining route.
I don't know about you, but my 'traceroute baidu.com' passes through AT&T, an american company that is mentioned first in about every article and lawsuit about the NSA mass surveillance.
So if you're willing to buy into the theory of China performing this attack just for a demonstration of ability (because there's no other visible benefit), how can we know it isn't exactly the other way round?
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSA_warrantless_surveillance_(2001%E2%80%9307)#Developments http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSA_warrantless_surveillance_(2...
[2] https://www.eff.org/nsa-spying https://www.eff.org/nsa-spying
- NelsonMinar 12y agoChinese infrastructure, not the Chinese government There's no meaningful difference.
- sarciszewski 12y agoGovernments can lose control of their infrastructure in the face of a well-equipped hacker.
- emidln 12y agoDemonstration of ability is one way to put it. Limited weapons testing is another. You don't enter a fight with untested weapons.
- moe 12y agoLimited weapons testing That's not a very convincing theory. For a proof of concept they'd only have to mangle a handful of requests without anyone noticing. There's no need to attract everyone's attention and inform your potential opponents about your capabilities.