3 ms·
Your answer's better than mine, I kinda half-assed it. I don't know if Macrium made it into our last round of backup software evals, and we're overdue for anot
by thaumaturgy 12y ago
Your answer's better than mine, I kinda half-assed it.
I don't know if Macrium made it into our last round of backup software evals, and we're overdue for another one anyway (and not terribly happy with Acronis).
Anything about it you don't like?
- tempestn 12y agoOnly that it doesn't support Acronis-style incremental images. So imaging takes more time and space. It also (last I checked) doesn't provide a way to automatically delete old images (but that's easy enough to script). It does do full images very quickly and reliability though, which is worth it for me. I tried for a long time to like Acronis. Even submitted several bug reports. But I had no end of problems, and even aside from the annoyance and wasted time, I don't want to trust a program with such quality control issues with my backups.