Yes. Certain instances of "more market" decision making where technology permits it, e.g. making people pay the true cost of driving their own car, would probab

Yes. Certain instances of "more market" decision making where technology permits it, e.g. making people pay the true cost of driving their own car, would probably have gotten more cities better and more extensive public transit sooner. The free market produces efficient results without respect to morality, so it can just as well choose overt racism and murder to achieve that perceived efficiency. It doesn't make a free market inherently bad, but it's certainly not inherently good or better than a sometimes "nanny" government. When I think of anarcho-capitalism, it's visions of The Gangs of New York. Something that could possibly arrive at more moral results most of the time would be anarcho-syndicalism, but the syndicalism component drives staunch capitalists bezerk. What? No one to exploit? That's not fair!