3 ms·
> It was conversion from standard MongoDB to RocksDB based MongoDB Well that would have been relevant information to put in the article now wouldn't it?
by juliangregorian 12y ago
> It was conversion from standard MongoDB to RocksDB based MongoDB
Well that would have been relevant information to put in the article now wouldn't it?
- nemothekid 12y agoIts probably caused by a misunderstanding. RocksDB is just a "library" - not really a database in the sense that you can connect to it and query it. So to someone well understood in the space going from RocksDB to MongoDB without mentioning any sort of front end is meaningless. It would be like going from Postgres to Sqlite.
- juliangregorian 12y agoWhat are you going on about? You can absolutely use RocksDB standalone, as you can Postgres and SQLite.