3 ms·

That's enticing, are there any references/benchmarks to back it up?

• Titanous 12y ago
  The protocol itself is much cleaner, but I'm not aware of any recent benchmarks. Compare https://ericvh.github.io/9p-rfc/rfc9p2000.html https://ericvh.github.io/9p-rfc/rfc9p2000.html vs https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5661 https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5661
  • kilburn 12y ago
    TODO: conduct this comparison when 9p specification is not full of "TODOs"...
    • Titanous 12y ago
      Oops, missed that. This is more complete: http://man.cat-v.org/plan_9/5/intro http://man.cat-v.org/plan_9/5/intro
• antocv 12y ago
  From my own benchmark, on kernel Linux 3.19.3.201503270049-1-grsec, qemu 2.2.1, 9p was 500% slower on read and immensily - after 9min gave on the write test which took 29s on host.