4 ms·
Sounds like they are recommending to use an anti-pattern. Share your storage across instances.... You really don't want to do that.
by tschellenbach 12y ago
Sounds like they are recommending to use an anti-pattern. Share your storage across instances.... You really don't want to do that.
- teraflop 12y agoCare to explain why not? It works well enough for Google: http://static.googleusercontent.com/external_content/untrusted_dlcp/research.google.reverse-proxy.org/en/us/university/relations/facultysummit2010/storage_architecture_and_challenges.pdf http://static.googleusercontent.com/external_content/untrust...
- KaiserPro 12y agoIt works for HPC/VFX and "big data" /home thats on a network drive with an SLA.... concurrent versions of your app sitting next to each other somewhere in $PATH meaning you can roll forward/back by typing app-$version (or what ever your convention is) Quickly and efficiently share files between instances. It basically means you can treat a node group as single proper linux cluster, without having to buy GPFS licenses or indulge in the horror that is glusterfs.