>>It's worth noting in that case you mentioned above it was mobile phone footage that led to him being charged, not a dash cam[3]. I do agree on your points, w

>>It's worth noting in that case you mentioned above it was mobile phone footage that led to him being charged, not a dash cam[3]. I do agree on your points, which are all well made. Do you think he would have been charged had it not been for the civilian video? Or do you think it simply would've taken longer to charge him since they would have to get the video off his dash cam, review it, and then decide whether to take action.