3 ms·
This looks nice! Led me to think about default styles--I suppose one of the strengths of HTML is that it describes the meaning of the content rather than the pr
by klum 12y ago
This looks nice! Led me to think about default styles--I suppose one of the strengths of HTML is that it describes the meaning of the content rather than the presentation--it's up to the client to present the various elements as they see fit. On the other hand, why couldn't the default look in a normal browser be something like this or like http://bettermotherfuckingwebsite.com/ http://bettermotherfuckingwebsite.com/ ? I'm not sure there's a reason an unstyled website should look like crap (well, I guess the reason is legacy baggage).
- talmand 12y agoI don't believe there's such a thing as an "unstyled" website. At least if you're looking at it through a browser. Even if the page has no css at all, the browser is still using css defaults that it has hard coded. That hard coded css can differ from browser to browser. If one were to dig into it, you can often change much of these defaults to your preferences. That's why there are css resets and projects like this or Normalize. They make base html look the same across browsers before you start creating design-based css.
- klum 12y agoSure, what I meant was that the hardcoded CSS could perhaps be a bit more useful. Useful and consistent across browsers--that's wishful thinking, of course :)