3 ms·
> those who understand gun safety know very well that one never points a gun at another human being unless one fully intends to kill them. This was one of the
by kenbellows 12y ago
> those who understand gun safety know very well that one never points a gun at another human being unless one fully intends to kill them.
This was one of the biggest criticisms I heard[1][2] (and raised) regarding the protests in Ferguson. The police officers had their weapons constantly trained on the protesters, including sniper rifles and other unnecessarily large weapons. It really sent a bad message, that they were seemingly ready to kill anyone who stepped one foot over the line they laid down. Whether or not this was actually true, it certainly seemed that way.
[1] http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2014/08/14/ferguson-and-the-shocking-nature-of-us-police-militarization http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2014/08/14/ferguson-and-...
[2] https://twitter.com/ryanjreilly/status/499691017533403137 https://twitter.com/ryanjreilly/status/499691017533403137
- hga 12y agoSee my first comment in this thread; that signaled very clearly they were willing to kill them, although nothing about intending (and indeed they didn't). See also a lot of the bad behavior after the Boston Marathon bombing in the futile Watertown search, lots of contemporary pictures, plus there's a recent report that's well discussed here that tells us just how badly managed it all was: http://weaponsman.com/?p=21830 http://weaponsman.com/?p=21830