Side note: the article contains quite a few language mistakes, mostly missing small words like "of" or "for": >This is probably a side effect over breeding >y

Side note: the article contains quite a few language mistakes, mostly missing small words like "of" or "for": >This is probably a side effect over breeding >you can find plenty of dogs that were simply disappeared economic reasons These mistakes are very easy to miss while scanning an article fast, as I (and presumably many other people) are nowadays wont to do with the enormous overload of information on the net. I would not be surprised if these words would much less used in the middle-term future.