3 ms·

> You realize you're commenting on a post about Apple's brand new app Photos, which is not the same thing as iPhoto, right? I was commenting on a comment which

> You realize you're commenting on a post about Apple's brand new app Photos, which is not the same thing as iPhoto, right? I was commenting on a comment which talked about Apple's file system in a critical manner discussing how it can become corrupted. I shared a story regarding how iPhoto had many issues like this years ago which makes me wary of using any Apple photo application. Seemed on topic with the thread to me. > it's a new codebase rather than an update to iPhoto. Source? I had not heard this. I heard multiple things mostly which pointed to basing the new application off of Aperture's code base.

eridius 12y ago
The point of your comment seems to be "iPhoto is untrustworthy, I don't think I'm willing to give it another shot". Photos.app isn't iPhoto. I think I was perfectly warranted in pointing that out. > I heard multiple things mostly which pointed to basing the new application off of Aperture's code base. I actually hadn't heard that, but I guess what I meant was Photos.app isn't based on the iPhoto codebase. Whether it's 100% fresh code, or whether it's based on the Aperture codebase, I don't know.
- BinaryIdiot 12y ago
  > The point of your comment seems to be "iPhoto is untrustworthy, I don't think I'm willing to give it another shot". Photos.app isn't iPhoto. I think I was perfectly warranted in pointing that out. So you decided to completely ignore my explanation as to what I was commenting on and simply reiterated what you already said? Why troll HN? I don't get it.