3 ms·
This looks cool! I see this helping a lot of people just get started and focus on what they do (until they include something else and it screws it all up :P) T
by t3ra 12y ago
This looks cool! I see this helping a lot of people just get started and focus on what they do (until they include something else and it screws it all up :P)
The first thing that comes to my mind is making themes for this! Should fork and play around.
But how far can be push this ... What about grids ?
- untothebreach 12y agoI am the farthest thing from a CSS expert, so if someone came up with a decent grid system that was class-less (like this "framework" currently is) I would be ecstatic. Till then, I will wait for `flexbox` to be fully supported in all the browsers I care about :)
- rolfvandekrol 12y agoDid you take a look at Neat? http://neat.bourbon.io/ http://neat.bourbon.io/
- rado 12y agoMy framework http://natuive.net http://natuive.net has class-less grid, just put anything in a .row div.
- rolfvandekrol 12y agoHow is a grid that requires a .row class exactly class-less?
- talmand 12y agoA grid system without classes would be an incredible feat as I view it as near impossible. Sure, you could do it via targeting elements with descending and sibling selectors but you would have to stick to a rigorous markup pattern and could never, ever change it. Plus there's the risk of eventually affecting elements not intended to be targeted. I imagine the same problem would exist for flexbox as well, unless the browsers start having proper flex elements. This isn't really a framework so to speak, it's a css reset. Much like Normalize and Skeleton. There's nothing wrong with it, as more options along those lines are always welcome.