5 ms·
In short: no, not everyone is equally skilled, but you're going to miss a lot of gems if you only hire from MIT's peer institutions. You are correct, but that
by nixme 17y ago
In short: no, not everyone is equally skilled, but you're going to miss a lot of gems if you only hire from MIT's peer institutions.
You are correct, but that doesn't matter. Hiring filters are intentionally excessively restrictive because a bad hire is much worse than losing out on a few good individuals.
Remember that in our industry (and probably others), even a full-day interview tells you very little about a candidate and their ability.
- amichail 17y agoIs this a form of discrimination? Is it legal?
- tsally 17y agoAs opposed to being forced to interview every candidate who applies?
- gcheong 17y agoIt is a legal form of discrimination.
- nixme 17y agoIs this a form of discrimination? It is a form of exclusion based on past education and experience. Are you implying that it is unethical to do so? I say no. Past performance is the best predictor of future performance. Getting accepted into and performing well at a top-tier university is past performance. This will undoubtedly exclude many great candidates. But the reality of hiring is that there's always a time constraint and bad hires are incredibly disastrous to an organization. Is it legal? In the United States, it is certainly legal to judge candidates on their education and experience. I'd also wager it's legal just about everywhere. Otherwise, as tsally said, employers would be forced to interview just about anyone that applies for a position.