I'm a big fan of Thomas Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. But revolutions are supposed to be hard, as are changes to the Constitution, etc. But I

I'm a big fan of Thomas Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. But revolutions are supposed to be hard, as are changes to the Constitution, etc. But I'm thinking an open trust network can actually support revolutionary research: acceptance/rejection is not limited to the small subset of scientists that control journals. Fringe scientists can provide positive peer review to something, and add supportive research, allowing a gradual growth of support. And if this fringe that went against the grain early, and are ultimately proven right, they gain a lot of trust in the system for being early.