2 ms·
That's a bit of an oversimplification that I'd like to point out. Math proofs are certainly more rigorous and physics does rely on a bit more of an intuitive p
by Vraxx 12y ago
That's a bit of an oversimplification that I'd like to point out. Math proofs are certainly more rigorous and physics does rely on a bit more of an intuitive property in some ways, but that doesn't mean that intuition is the main source of proving things in physics. A bit of empirical evidence falls in there too. (Something mathematicians don't rely on as heavily :P)