2 ms·
I took a look at it and .. decided to pass. I know this is lame, but its too much fuss to set it up and learn to use it before I'll get any immediate benefit o
by fit2rule 12y ago
I took a look at it and .. decided to pass. I know this is lame, but its too much fuss to set it up and learn to use it before I'll get any immediate benefit out of it. At first, I found the idea appealing - get some sensible window management occurring in OSX, where it seriously needs it. But then it just seemed like too much of a bolt-on to an OS that already feels pretty kludged up by things like duet and tunnelblick : things which should really be part of the OS, but are instead maintained by third parties.
As much as I feel Amethyst has a place, I think its also a real nuisance that such things are being ignored by Apple in their effort to refine their OS. Finder is still a piece of junk, 15 years after everyone started noticing just how much junk it is!
On the other hand - if Amethyst gets a feature that will make any opened Finder window auto-layout itself for optimal-fit of its content, I'll pay you a donation right away. Don't know what I mean - try this, open a Finder window, hit ⌘-2 (so you're in List view), and see what I mean - did the Finder window auto-size to accommodate the content? Do the columns in list view auto-size to fit just the column info needed? Nope. Make Amethyst handle this, like I said, and I'll make an instant donation - it has irked me for decades that this simple feature doesn't get any attention .. yet it would do a lot to forward the aesthetics of Finder in my case.