3 ms·
That would be discrimination on the part of the female applicants, not on the part of the employer. The woman is not hired because she chose not to apply, not b
by yummyfajitas 12y ago
That would be discrimination on the part of the female applicants, not on the part of the employer. The woman is not hired because she chose not to apply, not because she was rejected by the employer's choice.
- SamReidHughes 12y agoJust like how black people discriminate between businesses that have "whites only" signs in front and businesses that don't.