6 ms·
I fell head over heals for a girl. I thought about her way too often, missed her way more than a normal person ought to, and was pretty much in a constant state
by t3mp3st 17y ago
I fell head over heals for a girl. I thought about her way too often, missed her way more than a normal person ought to, and was pretty much in a constant state of love-induced sugar shock. I didn't want to seem overzealous or desperate, so I tried to play it cool -- and yet, the impulse to post embarrassing, saccharine love quotes to Facebook was overwhelming (I am but only a dork, after all).
So I did what any self-respecting geek would do in my position: I computed a SHA-2 hash of her name and put it in that weird little box thingy on the left hand side of my Facebook profile. It provided just the right balance of self expression and social tact. I was happy.
I liked the idea so much that I decided I would wrap it in a small application and dedicate it to the object of my dorkitude. As I knew it would take a few weeks to flesh out and things were (shockingly) starting to work out between this lovely individual and myself, I thought that the final product might make for a cute little way of sharing my feelings. The idea of tiny "cupidcode" links spreading across facebook and the twitters -- each rooted in my nerdy affection for this particular young lady -- seemed like a terribly powerful way to say "I really think you're great". And because I suck at music and writing, it was pretty much my only option.
Fast forward a few weeks, and cupidco.de is done. It's probably not well suited for the sorts of folks that read YC so I hope you don't mind me sharing my link with you. My hope is that this post will kick-start the spread of a few cupidcodes 'cross the nets so that my crush (who I've been seeing now for about two weeks!) may casually stumble upon one while checking her facebook or reading a blog and discover just how special she is to me.
tl;dr -- fell in love with a chick, wanted to do something special for her, suck at everything else, so I built her a webapp.
- shitcock 17y agoThis is pathetic and you're pathetic.
- SlyShy 17y agoYou had to create an account just to express that sentiment? I find that more pathetic.
- grosales 17y agoWow buddy, you need to go back to reddit, Digg (seeing that those are the type of places where you see this kind of comments more often) or whevever you came from.
- ATB 17y agoAn intriguing coincidence? http://www.penny-arcade.com/images/2004/20040319h.jpg http://www.penny-arcade.com/images/2004/20040319h.jpg
- alaskamiller 17y agoIf she was a geek this would be a pretty good icebreaker. Or a really creepy one. Keep it smooth!
- t3mp3st 17y agoyeah -- that's definitely true. I would have silently swept the project under the rug/archive.org if things hadn't worked out, but we've really started to connect, especially about our respective geekitude-- so I'm pretty confident that she'll think this sweet and not weird.
- frossie 17y agoNah, I don't think it's creepy at all. I once received a love-letter in obfuscated perl. I married the sender. Good luck :-)
- t3mp3st 17y agoThat is absolutely amazing. Any chance that you might share, or was it (unsurprisingly) very personal?
- frossie 17y agoWell, it is personal, it is also seriously obfuscated - it started off something like for(split(//,'*)))*1)11.41))9291:.3+*A11:1:3)/+,))9:' and of course that was part of the fun - since I had received it in paper form, I had to type it all in to figure out what it said (no I couldn't parse it by sight), which heightened the effect. Anyway, point is - once a geek always a geek, and the right person for you is somebody who appreciates it, not runs away from it.
- SlyShy 17y agoHonestly though, she'll probably take it better if you tell her yourself. Otherwise it'll look like you were hiding this from her, and that'll start to bring up uncomfortable questions. :P
- t3mp3st 17y agohaha -- a veeeeeeeery valid point. we're both comfortable and open with one another right now, so I'm very confident that this would fall into the "sweet" category and not the "creepy" category. I'll tread veeeery carefully though :)
- mcantor 17y agoThis is adorable, and I hope things work out for you. I showed my girlfriend (who is a geek, but not a programmer or engineer or anything of the sort) and she commented: "Okay, that's the cutest f*ing thing EVER." Some suggestions--What about alternate spellings? It would be unfortunate if someone typed in "Kat Smith" and came up as incorrect because the original poster typed "Kathryn Smith". Also, it would be nice if there were some kind of personalization that you could apply to the public page; you know, like "Guess John Smith's crush" instead of "Guess My Crush".
- t3mp3st 17y agoThanks so much, especially for your ideas. I wanted to avoid any sort of sign up, so I don't actually collect the "crusher"'s name (just the "crushee"). The system will tolerate names within an edit-distance of 2, so many common spelling errors will be ignored (not to mention the added layer of plausible deniability). I also recently added a "really close"/"close"/"sorta close"/"way off" hinting system -- so when you guess, you'll see that the prompt reflects how similar your guess is to the actual crushee. One thing I'm going to add is a little cookie-based cache of your recent cupidco.de tracking pages, as they start to get difficult to juggle after some time.
- mcantor 17y agoHmmm. But, there is still a secret tracking page connected to the public page, right? Shouldn't it be possible to use the secret tracking page to enter your name, and have the changes be reflected on the public page? Kudos for completely avoiding sign up, btw. If there's no way to do what I described above without adding sign up, then for God's sake, don't do it. You're a champ for breaking the sign up trend already. The hinting system is such an awesome idea. I'll have to spread this around to a couple of my buddies so I can try it out!
- t3mp3st 17y agoThanks! I wanted to keep the site as simple as possible; sign up is a pain in the butt and typically totally unnecessary. It should be possible to let you recycle your cupidco.de (so as to switch out the crush name, etc). Is that what you mean? I'll look into that tonight.
- chasingsparks 17y agoEverything about this project was meta-interesting. I feel like someone could write a very entertaining NYT piece about this project. If this was not posted on HN, I would think the narrative was bogus. However, being posted on HN, I doubt you are feigning hopeless romanticism. P.S. I am half-convinced XKCD started for a similar reason. http://xkcd.com/55/ http://xkcd.com/55/
- t3mp3st 17y agoI'm flattered that you think that! As embarrassing as it is, I'm really as dorky as described.
- chasingsparks 17y agoI once bought a girl I was semi-obsessed a six-volume set of a series about WWI published three years after WWI. She was a FP nut, so I thought it was cool. I did so even though I knew she was taking a plane the next day. I even wrote a good essay length inscription, informing her that she was awesome. Sometimes, it's fun to say f*ck rationality. Good luck to you, sir.
- mcantor 17y agoDid it work? Was she touched?
- chasingsparks 17y agoYet to be determined.
- HistoryInAction 17y agoWhat is this series? Gotta love the Great War :) Best of luck to you too.
- chasingsparks 17y agoI found it in an antique bookstore near Dupont Circle in Washington, D.C. (where I live.) I forget the name.