3 ms·
If you're robbing a place and your punishment for being caught is effectively life in prison, what reason do you have not to murder all the potential witnesses
by theorique 12y ago
If you're robbing a place and your punishment for being caught is effectively life in prison, what reason do you have not to murder all the potential witnesses to improve your odds of getting away with the crime? All you have is morality, and I don't want to rely on the morality of criminals.
In Heat, Al Pacino's character summarizes this attitude in a quick line (paraphrase): "Once it escalated to a murder-one for all of them, why not pop guard number two because ... what difference does it make?"
The scene is an armored truck holdup and a loose-cannon member of the robbers' crew shoots one of the two guards (By accident? Or is he a psychopath?). After this, the second guard needs to die, as a living witness, because the entire crew is already exposed to first-degree murder charges. Simple risk management.
- mikeash 12y agoRight. In that scene, the criminals (aside from the nutjob who shoots the first guard) are somewhat moral, but once the first guard dies, the cold calculations outweigh their somewhat loose morality. (Great movie, too. If anyone else is reading this and wonders wtf it's all about, go check it out.)
- ta0967 12y agoThe movie stands out for the actoring duel between Pacino and DeNiro, as well as (IIRC) sound.