3 ms·
I mean I can easily think of a reason in which they should be responsible. If they weren't doing background checks on their employees, or ignoring results from
by sn3twork 12y ago
I mean I can easily think of a reason in which they should be responsible.
If they weren't doing background checks on their employees, or ignoring results from those, or not being thorough in them?
- clinta 12y agoI'm not a lawyer and can't comment on if they are liable or not, but I take issue with the idea that they should be. Adding this liability just compounds the current issues where felons are nearly incapable of becoming employed after serving their sentence. If the state determines that a person is safe enough to the general public to be released from prison, why should an employer be expected to investigate beyond that? On the flip side, if a person is a significant threat, the state should be liable for letting them out of prison, not the employer who hired them.