3 ms·
I was expecting a hit piece of sorts, but was surprised to see that the point of this article isn't Joel, but just uses an exchange Joel had on here as an examp
by bena 17y ago
I was expecting a hit piece of sorts, but was surprised to see that the point of this article isn't Joel, but just uses an exchange Joel had on here as an example of a larger problem.
If I were the submitter, I'd correct the title to remove the "(and Joel Spolsky)" as it emphasizes the wrong part of the article and isn't present in the actual title.
- kalendae 17y agowould be more correct to have (even Joel Spolsky)
- run4yourlives 17y agoThe fact that we all seem to assume Joel is above the standard communication defects found in all humans concerns me.
- pyre 17y agoSomeone that is viewed as a good communicator will be viewed by people as having overcome/conquered such shortcomings whether it's true or not.