4 ms·
You have no idea whatsoever how these systems are built. You don't know because you haven't seen the software (or hardware) for them. You haven't because (I as
by mcherm 12y ago
You have no idea whatsoever how these systems are built.
You don't know because you haven't seen the software (or hardware) for them. You haven't because (I assume this part) you weren't one of the state inspectors, and what many (most?) of the manufacturers have done is to insist that no one ELSE be allowed to view the details since it's a "trade secret".
So maybe there is excellent logging like you describe. And maybe there isn't. We DO know that there have been occasional incidents of invalid vote reporting by the machines (such as [1] or [2]) that were not caught by such log systems.
[1] http://www.networkworld.com/article/2275174/lan-wan/e-voting-vendor--programming-errors-caused-dropped-votes.html http://www.networkworld.com/article/2275174/lan-wan/e-voting...
[2] http://www.hackingdemocracy.com/ http://www.hackingdemocracy.com/
- atirip 12y agoActually i have seen the software, here it is https://github.com/vvk-ehk/evalimine https://github.com/vvk-ehk/evalimine
- pdkl95 12y agoYou cast your vote at a github-hosted source code repository? As René Magritte might have put it, "Ce n'est pas le logiciel". You haven't seen the software - you've only seen source code that may resemble what is running when you cast your vote.