3 ms·
That's a reasonable approach, though of course it means that you can never have a 100% e-voting system as the security of the thing is contingent on there being
by throwaway7767 12y ago
That's a reasonable approach, though of course it means that you can never have a 100% e-voting system as the security of the thing is contingent on there being a regular paper ballot.
> And your hypothetical case is really a kidnapping, criminal offence, not scalable.
No, there is no need for kidnapping. Human relationships are complicated and pressure can be applied in many ways. A spouse, father, or other person can influence people in his direct vicinity. The secret ballot and requirment that only one person enters the voting booth at a time ensures that that influence does not extend to the election result.