4 ms·
I disagree entirely. Accusing someone of shilling doesn't contribute meaningfully unless it can be proved, and proved with damning evidence. Anything else is rh
by oldmanjay 12y ago
I disagree entirely. Accusing someone of shilling doesn't contribute meaningfully unless it can be proved, and proved with damning evidence. Anything else is rhetorical bluster meant to distract and has no place in a discussion.
- superobserver 12y agoI didn't say a baseless accusation is legitimate, I said that suggesting such a possibility is legitimate, especially in this case.