3 ms·
It isn't even about that. It is that the completely clean guy who is standing for integrity who gets told 'either you do as we say or we will convince the worl
by Lawtonfogle 12y ago
It isn't even about that. It is that the completely clean guy who is standing for integrity who gets told 'either you do as we say or we will convince the world you are a child molester, and trust us, we can plant all the evidence we want where ever we need to'.
- XorNot 12y agoWhich has nothing to do with surveillance. If you're going to flat out lie and make stuff up then you quite literally do not need to do any surveillance. John Kerry's war record being tarnished was done openly, publicly, and without any involvement of the NSA (which would have been useless to the cause anyway).
- LLWM 12y agoThat's not an argument against mass surveillance. Collecting evidence you are a child molestor, aka lying and saying you did, only requires targeted surveillance.