2.0 is very valid. They let it loose and a few devs, including myself have put off fully investing in Angular 1.0. I was investing in Angular 1.0 until this hap

2.0 is very valid. They let it loose and a few devs, including myself have put off fully investing in Angular 1.0. I was investing in Angular 1.0 until this happen. While working professionally, my team lead chosen Ember.JS. Anyway, in general Angular have a very different way to do thing and you basically create html element and the js will defined the html behavior. In general, I think the announcement of Angular 2 have slowed down the momentum of 1.0 very much. Angular 2 from what people have been saying is totally completely different from 1 and it could be name something else and noone could tell it's an angular framework from 1. With all the js front end framework out there, I think it's too wild west and I rather let this area mature much more before choosing one. Unless you can afford to rewrite frontend code every few years... I'd stick with backend rendering web pages, plus it's SEO friendly.