4 ms·
Ok, read it, not worth reading. Go read Stuart Russell instead : https://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~russell/papers/russell-edge14-myths-moonshine.docx https://www.cs.
by sgt101 12y ago
Ok, read it, not worth reading. Go read Stuart Russell instead : https://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~russell/papers/russell-edge14-myths-moonshine.docx https://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~russell/papers/russell-edge14-m...
1) He is an active and substantial participant in the community.
2) It's about 500 words
3) It makes sense
4) It doesn't mention Freud
5) It uses short words
- Retra 12y ago"Any sufficiently capable intelligent system will prefer to ensure its own continued existence and to acquire physical and computational resources – not for their own sake, but to succeed in its assigned task." I am always surprised when people say this kind of thing. A human-utility designed AI would identify "it's own" to be decidedly human. And thus it's assigned task would be human. Assuming you properly pinned down human utility sufficiently to call it a successful AI.
- sgt101 12y agoI agree with you - I think that being frighted of AI's is as rational as being frightened of children, but Prof. Russell is a more authoritative source than me, and I think it would be better for people to read his stuff than the nonsense that the parent links to.