5 ms·
Of course, everybody wants to have an LTS release of every piece of software they depend on, that "just works" for all their use cases [1], and that somebody el
by the_why_of_y 12y ago
Of course, everybody wants to have an LTS release of every piece of software they depend on, that "just works" for all their use cases [1], and that somebody else maintains for many years, like magic.
The problem is, nobody wants to pay for its maintenance, hence it does not exist [2].
In the FOSS world, nobody is entitled to a pony.
Also it's rather ironic that it's an OpenBSD developer wanting this, considering http://www.tedunangst.com/flak/post/long-term-support-considered-harmful http://www.tedunangst.com/flak/post/long-term-support-consid... - how does that reasoning not apply to compilers?
[1] including of course the all-important Motorola 88k back-end!
[2] with very few exceptions: RHEL, SLES
- JoelJacobson 12y agoThat's not true for all open source projects. Look at PostgreSQL for instance, they back-patch all bugfixes (where possible) to all of the previous supported major versions.
- tedunangst 12y agoMiod and I have different opinions. Anyway, what I think Miod really wants is a compiler free from regressions. Unfortunately, new compiler versions tend to introduce at least as many regressions as bug fixes.