2 ms·

I read it, I don't see where you addressed it.

• akshatpradhan 12y ago
  I can't see where its addressed either. Could OP update the comment?
• anigbrowl 12y ago
  I told you: in the very next sentence. Here is the second sentence of my previous post, again: Also, it won't affect people in terms of legal advice, plea deals etc. because it only applies to people who launch attacks on critical infrastructure from outside the country, and thus beyond the reach of US police. Sorry if this doesn't clear things up for you, but how much simpler do you expect me to make it? It is a pretty straightforward sentence, even though it does contain a small grammar mistake (it should read '...and are thus beyond the reach...').
  • downandout 12y ago
    You're stating that because someone is suspected of launching an attack from outside the US that they are "beyond the reach of US police". This is not a valid assumption. The US government has extradition agreements with most of the world's developed countries, and even where it doesn't, often applies political pressure to get what it wants. As an aside, this order is far more broad than you state here. It extends to people that have done business with them, in any capacity. That will in many cases extend to US citizens.