4 ms·
They say resist it, which is materially different from saying not to do it. Goading is another story entirely. I will add that in practice, adding this defensi
by codezero 12y ago
They say resist it, which is materially different from saying not to do it. Goading is another story entirely.
I will add that in practice, adding this defensive layer has had the opposite effect, it has resulted in more compassionate voting, rather than more downvotes, on my comments, which reinforces why I did it here and have done it in the past, so I question why it's such a big deal, to me, the big deal is the fact that there is an expectation of surprise downvotes, that you can't expect a discussion without driveby negative feedback is a sign of a very toxic community.
Since this is a point of contention, though, I'll try to resist in the future, but I still call out to anyone to ask of the community – why do you downvote so readily, rather than upvoting equally as readily? Check out the Wikipedia article for critical positivity: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_positivity_ratio http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_positivity_ratio – there's no reason we can't make HN a positive environment.
- vacri 12y agowhy do you downvote so readily, rather than upvoting equally as readily? They don't. The vast majority of users have positive karma scores, including yourself. You just can't see positive votes for other users, as they're invisible. You're arguing from selection bias here. If you are interested in a higher quality conversation, then try out those guidelines. You may also want to find better links when you want to support your argument - that wiki page starts out "The critical positivity ratio ... is a largely discredited concept", and most of the article is spent arguing against it.
- codezero 12y agoYep, the mathematics behind it are discredited, I hadn't seen this development, thanks!