3 ms·
Thousands? More like dozens. And I bet they will return to Twitter very soon when they realize they can't do their job effectively on a social network that's co
by zak_mc_kracken 12y ago
Thousands? More like dozens. And I bet they will return to Twitter very soon when they realize they can't do their job effectively on a social network that's completely empty.
> The growth was so explosive that the some of the existing GNU social nodes were unable to handle the traffic
This would be a lot more impressive with actual numbers. Without numbers, it just feels like the numbers went from 100 to 200 and the network is so underpowered and badly implemented that it just collapsed.
Remember: always be suspicious of people who cite growth numbers instead of absolute ones, they are hiding the fact that these absolute numbers are bad, otherwise, they would be using them.
Edit: looks like it already happened. The only account named in this puff piece tweeted just three hours ago:
https://twitter.com/barbijaputa https://twitter.com/barbijaputa
and he's pretty much inactive on Quitter.