4 ms·
> the plaintiff should have to show by a preponderance of evidence that the modification did not cause the crash. I can see this going the opposite way too. E
by pyre 12y ago
> the plaintiff should have to show by a preponderance of evidence that the modification did not cause the crash.
I can see this going the opposite way too. E.g. the automaker says that they are not liable because the customer modified the audio system, even though it was the ABS that failed.
- Zak 12y agoSure, but they'd have a very uphill battle convincing a jury of that. This isn't "breaking seal voids warranty". This is "you, and you alone are responsible for the results of modifications you make".