>If it is valid, on-topic criticism, it isn't gratuitous negativity. We'll need some assurance that invalid criticism can also fall under the category of "not

>If it is valid, on-topic criticism, it isn't gratuitous negativity. We'll need some assurance that invalid criticism can also fall under the category of "not gratuitously negative" as well. Otherwise, we've just defined "invalid" criticism as being against the rules. And strangely, the people in power are always the ones whose viewpoints are "valid", "true", etc.