"A software monoculture at least gives reviewers a fighting chance of spotting issues with software that might affect the validity of results." If I understand

"A software monoculture at least gives reviewers a fighting chance of spotting issues with software that might affect the validity of results." If I understand it correctly, this observation shows just what a short distance we've come in programming languages and software development since the 1960s. Verifying the correctness of a program shouldn't depend on good naming or being able to execute it in your head.