3 ms·
Interesting points. It may not have been clear, but I kind of glossed over the idea that this would be a standard. So, for example, perhaps embedded in HTTP h
by datashovel 12y ago
Interesting points. It may not have been clear, but I kind of glossed over the idea that this would be a standard. So, for example, perhaps embedded in HTTP headers like Content-Type values.
So, I was being lazy in terms of the details, but to be fair I wasn't trying to be too technical.
Also, I may not understand the point, but I get the impression that a meta browser would make it so "cats can be cats" without the need to herd them, and without worrying that non-compliance could potentially disrupt innovation.
The meta browser would (in my mind) become the new browser, and all the meat that you get in Chrome, FF, IE would be encapsulated behind the scenes.
So it certainly would not be a trivial project (although I agree on the surface having a meta app whose only purpose was to encapsulate another application would be somewhat trivial) the ideal scenario would call for standardized apis that the meta app could interface with the browsers so things like browser preferences could be integrated in the top-level, and each app underneath would be able to read from that same set of options. Of course each browser would need to have name-spaced options as well for things that weren't globally recognized / standardized, but those kinds of problems I think have fairly straightforward answers at this stage.