>If a lab does not have the equipment to reproduce a certain experiment, it's not the problem of the original authors. While I think that's true, a paper can p

>If a lab does not have the equipment to reproduce a certain experiment, it's not the problem of the original authors. While I think that's true, a paper can potentially be much more impactful if its' results can be easily understood by others, and isn't that really the point of science? In that sense, it's better for the author to stay away from niche methods and tools unless absolutely necessary.