Beware anyone who lumps all those who disagree with them into a single group. Beware even more if the person then imputes motives and thoughts to the opponents.

Beware anyone who lumps all those who disagree with them into a single group. Beware even more if the person then imputes motives and thoughts to the opponents. The author spends quite a bit of time calling out opposing arguments as fallacious, but spends the rest of the time either begging the question (bitcoin is great - not saying why bitcoin is great, only saying what nefarious motives underly those who say bitcoin isn't great) or constructing straw men (is there a serious (not fringe) argument that all software everywhere should be under government regulation? I would like to see a reference, please).