4 ms·
I agree, unless it's something that can't be done well in the current language. Or, if like me, you're an economist and the default language used by academics i
by Gimpei 12y ago
I agree, unless it's something that can't be done well in the current language. Or, if like me, you're an economist and the default language used by academics is horrible, horrible Stata, which needs to be replaced by R.
- zzleeper 12y agoFor me, both are horrible. I use Stata a lot and thought a lot about switching to R (there is even a nice tutorial by Matthieu Gomez at http://www.princeton.edu/~mattg/statar/ http://www.princeton.edu/~mattg/statar/ ). However, I believe that moving to R is not the answer, as you will still be riddled with a lot of the problems that you faced in Stata such as a quirky syntax (except backticks. I hate those backticks). Maybe Python will catch up (I doubt it, what we need is a DSL, not something too general that requires loong commands to do a simple regress). My best bet would be Julia, but it's still a long way to go regarding things like missing values.
- grayclhn 12y agoIf you're a macroeconomist, the default is Matlab. I'm not sure which is worse.