4 ms·
"They write something stupid, then people write rebuttals explaining how it's stupid, building flow and page rank" 37Signals is also guilty - however proving t
by dpcan 17y ago
"They write something stupid, then people write rebuttals explaining how it's stupid, building flow and page rank"
37Signals is also guilty - however proving that the system works brilliantly.
Too bad all the rebuttals are typically incoherent nonsense making the original nonsense seem even more important and profound.
(edit: Thank you, I accept your down-vote as proof that the link baiting works and that you agree 37Signals and TC are both brilliant marketers as well as writers.)
- crux 17y agoActually, I suspect you're getting downvoted because the article has nothing to do with 37Signals, and thus your comment was wildly off-topic.
- dpcan 17y agoThe article was about Dvorak ranting on how getting feedback was important, and sometimes you'd write just to tick other people off. So, that's where I took it from TC to 37s. On topic.
- swombat 17y agoThat was actually one of my first thoughts upon finishing Carr's article: "sounds just like 37-signals". Attack random people, make controversial points (even if you contradict an earlier post), do anything to generate noise and traffic.