2 ms·
From a decision standpoint, wouldn't sites that require JS to render content be more important to read now, while they're correctly rendering? It's transient i
by diminoten 12y ago
From a decision standpoint, wouldn't sites that require JS to render content be more important to read now, while they're correctly rendering? It's transient information that may not exist tomorrow -- why would you choose to not read it?
Because presumably you're "NR" as a method of punishing the author of the page, but surely you can't think this act is in any way consequential.
- sp332 12y agoThe author wants people to read the content, so refusing to read it is meaningful.
- diminoten 12y agoThat puts too much emphasis on any individual reader. I'd argue the author wants to get an idea out, and if one person does or does not read the article, the idea will still be propagated by/to others.
- djfm 12y agoWouldn't say the original comment was so useless (even being from just one reader) after all: see the conversion thread it spawned! That being said I don't care about this JS issue.