4 ms·
The paper starts with: "Eleven FRBs have been detected so far, nine with the Parkes and one at the Arecibo telescope." That arithmetic is wrong. Tongue-in-the-
by dchichkov 12y ago
The paper starts with: "Eleven FRBs have been detected so far, nine with the Parkes and one at the Arecibo telescope." That arithmetic is wrong. Tongue-in-the-cheek - April's fool?
edit: it actually seems more like a genuine typo in a pre-print. The list further in the article contains 10 FRBs from Parkes.
edit 2: linked to the abstract.
http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.05245 http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.05245
- cpeterso 12y agoThe eleventh could have been detected somewhere else.
- Sniffnoy 12y agoA note -- if you're linking to arXiv, it's better to link to the abstract (http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.05245 http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.05245) rather than directly to the PDF. From the abstract, one can easily click through to the PDF; not so the reverse. And the abstract allows one to do things like see different versions of the paper, search for other things by the same authors, etc.