Actually, I addressed this point in my original comment: > As for not over-treating, that is a physician led decision - just because there is an anomaly on the

Actually, I addressed this point in my original comment: > As for not over-treating, that is a physician led decision - just because there is an anomaly on the scan does not mean that it will be removed or even necessarily treated at all. Perhaps I wasn't clear. I am saying that having cheaper, better scans with computer aided analysis is likely to be beneficial. I am not saying that every anomaly detected requires treatment. Treatment decisions are influenced by imaging but are not enforced by them.