3 ms·

You can access the entire text of article without the 'subscription wall' by accessing it through google search results: http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=

You can access the entire text of article without the 'subscription wall' by accessing it through google search results: http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CCAQqQIwAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wsj.com%2Farticles%2Feu-lays-groundwork-for-antitrust-charges-against-google-1427928793&ei=ptQcVcefJIOigwTWjoOQCA&usg=AFQjCNEX7Bkj-_ND_KwRbmuxtEPsv-civQ&sig2=IxhgpYe1LVxlla4OGh-jcQ&bvm=bv.89744112,d.eXY http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd... Is that irony? I don't know what irony means anymore. Hmm, might as well google it.

igravious 12y ago
It's recursively ironic which is the sweetest tasting type of irony. Any idea why going through search results succeeds and allows us access to the full content by the way?
- zem 12y ago
  because google won't display search result pages that show one view to the crawler but another to the person who clicks the link.
- violentvinyl 12y ago
  WSJ will get a better Google ranking by allowing the Google spider to crawl the whole article. If they allow the spider to crawl the whole article, then they have to allow users coming in from the Google results to see the full article as well.