> It's really hard to follow this. I realize they are trying to make it an explanation that normal (but interested) people can read. But it's not working. The

> It's really hard to follow this. I realize they are trying to make it an explanation that normal (but interested) people can read. But it's not working. The EFF often has this problem, IMHO, and I suspect it limits their ability to build support and awareness. I support the EFF; I'm an interested, knowledgable, well-educated person who is accustomed to reading sophisticated prose -- i.e., I'm their ideal audience -- and I gave up after a paragraph. I think they lose a large part of their potential audience. Matthew Butternick provides the following excellent advice to writers (which applies to much more than typography): http://typographyforlawyers.com/who-is-typography-for.html http://typographyforlawyers.com/who-is-typography-for.html