3 ms·
Ok, so they used an outdated client and then used a double operation on Couchbase when comparing to MongoDB. The other part of "doesn't scale" wasn't addressed
by wheaties 12y ago
Ok, so they used an outdated client and then used a double operation on Couchbase when comparing to MongoDB. The other part of "doesn't scale" wasn't addressed at all. I hate MongoDB with a passion (burned too many times) but even this is just FUD-like without numbers or something to back it up.
C'mon, you guys can do better than that. Just working is enough to show up Mongo. Seriously, the bar isn't that high.
- jchrisa 12y agoHere's the benchmark MongoDB was replying to with their benchmark: http://news.avalonconsult.com/2015/03/19/performance_benchmark/ http://news.avalonconsult.com/2015/03/19/performance_benchma... TLDR: for highly concurrent workloads on a nine node cluster, Couchbase Server handles way more traffic than MongoDB without response times slowing down.