3 ms·

Why are you hiding behind an anon account to post this?

notjustsox 12y ago
Because SoX is a dog whistle. If you point out that the real situation is more complicated, or if you bring in basic data like http://blog.thomsonreuters.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/HK-IPOs.jpg http://blog.thomsonreuters.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/HK... which can illustrate changing market and global dynamics, you can guarantee that some rabid assholes will harangue you. So rather than have that heaped at my account, I used a sock puppet. I think it's pretty gross that you called me out on it. But hey, thanks for helping to prove my point. Now I'll fuck off because I don't give a fuck what else an asshole like you might say.
- jacquesm 12y ago
  > Because I don't like dealing with assholes like you. Maybe that means I'm weaker than you. But whatever. You're a fucking jerk. You had me until your final paragraph. For reference: you're the jerk and I'm flagging your account.
  - fuckyoujacques 12y ago
    I'm completely unsurprised that you think it's fine for matt manser to shame people for using a sockpuppet to express an opinion, but totally unacceptable to call him a fucking jerk for doing so. It's really really disgusting that you decided to censor my reasoning because I happened to call a jerk a jerk. [accurate but embarrassing information about jacques deleted]
    - jacquesm 12y ago
      He simply asked you a question. I'll ignore the rest of your factually incorrect prose on the assumption it is there simply to provoke some kind of response.
      - fuckyoujacques 12y ago
        Bullshit that's 'simply asking a question'. 'Why did you make a throwaway?' is an attack, an attempt to intimidate, and nothing more. Context matters. [more accurate and embarrassing information about jacques deleted because it was wrong of me to stoop to his and matt's level]
  - yourethejerk 12y ago
    > For reference: you're the jerk. For reference, only a huge (and incredibly hypocritical) jerk would write that as a ban message.
dang 12y ago
This was in reply to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9299916 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9299916, but we've detached it as off-topic.
- fuckyoujacques 12y ago
  just kill the whole thing. it's matt answer and jacquesm being trollish assholes. it has no value, not even at the bottom of the page.

Because SoX is a dog whistle. If you point out that the real situation is more complicated, or if you bring in basic data like http://blog.thomsonreuters.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/HK-IPOs.jpg http://blog.thomsonreuters.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/HK... which can illustrate changing market and global dynamics, you can guarantee that some rabid assholes will harangue you. So rather than have that heaped at my account, I used a sock puppet. I think it's pretty gross that you called me out on it. But hey, thanks for helping to prove my point. Now I'll fuck off because I don't give a fuck what else an asshole like you might say.

jacquesm 12y ago
> Because I don't like dealing with assholes like you. Maybe that means I'm weaker than you. But whatever. You're a fucking jerk. You had me until your final paragraph. For reference: you're the jerk and I'm flagging your account.
- fuckyoujacques 12y ago
  I'm completely unsurprised that you think it's fine for matt manser to shame people for using a sockpuppet to express an opinion, but totally unacceptable to call him a fucking jerk for doing so. It's really really disgusting that you decided to censor my reasoning because I happened to call a jerk a jerk. [accurate but embarrassing information about jacques deleted]
  - jacquesm 12y ago
    He simply asked you a question. I'll ignore the rest of your factually incorrect prose on the assumption it is there simply to provoke some kind of response.
    - fuckyoujacques 12y ago
      Bullshit that's 'simply asking a question'. 'Why did you make a throwaway?' is an attack, an attempt to intimidate, and nothing more. Context matters. [more accurate and embarrassing information about jacques deleted because it was wrong of me to stoop to his and matt's level]
- yourethejerk 12y ago
  > For reference: you're the jerk. For reference, only a huge (and incredibly hypocritical) jerk would write that as a ban message.

dang 12y ago

This was in reply to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9299916 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9299916, but we've detached it as off-topic.

fuckyoujacques 12y ago
just kill the whole thing. it's matt answer and jacquesm being trollish assholes. it has no value, not even at the bottom of the page.