4 ms·
I agree. Think their price point is too expensive for most healthy consumers, so they are currently positioned for people who have a significant need to use th
by gleb 12y ago
I agree. Think their price point is too expensive for most healthy consumers, so they are currently positioned for people who have a significant need to use them.
- therobot24 12y agobut don't those who would have a significant need be those who wouldn't necessarily have the $40/month for the subscription
- Spooky23 12y agoWhen I had back problems, at one point I was doing PT 3x a week, seeing a neurosurgeon and a few other physicians. All the while I was dealing with recovery actions from a health insurer that assumed that an unrelated ER visit was the root cause (and potentially not my health insurers problem) Having this type of serve would have been awesome, and I would have gladly paid it!
- therobot24 12y agofair enough, i guess i was thinking more in terms of elderly or those who have a chronic illness where money is heading primarily to medical bills (from the many treatments)