3 ms·
In some cases maybe, but hopefully most founders who obtain some personal liquidity in later rounds are not sadistic/hypocritical enough to deny their employees
by npkarnik 12y ago
In some cases maybe, but hopefully most founders who obtain some personal liquidity in later rounds are not sadistic/hypocritical enough to deny their employees the same opportunity.
But you're right, one potential large risk is a Chris Sacca -like situation, where one investor/investment group uses many anonymous buying agents to acquire a huge stake in a takeout/IPO candidate, via secondary liquidity. That can mess up a final outcome for whoever thought they had control over the cap table.
- corford 12y agoBased on a comment further up, my understanding is people buying on the secondary markets are not actually buying the shares. They're just offering $X to an employee now in return for being entitled to the full sale price of that employee's shares ($Y) immediately after IPO. $Y could be higher or lower than $X (that's the agents risk) but at no time does the agent actually own the shares.
- gyardley 12y agoPeople buying on secondary markets often directly buy shares. They only resort to derivatives when they're unable to buy directly due to stock restrictions.
- corford 12y agoAren't most pre-IPO shares restricted though (company has ROFR, company board can block sale of shares to a third party they don't like etc.)?
- gyardley 12y agoYes, but the type of restriction matters. Sometimes it's just a ROFR at the same price, and that alone isn't enough to deter either buyers or sellers from directly buying and selling.