3 ms·
I realize that you are just making a snarky dig, but probably never. It would be a huge amount of work just to backport basic security fixes, and almost imposs
by mccr8 12y ago
I realize that you are just making a snarky dig, but probably never. It would be a huge amount of work just to backport basic security fixes, and almost impossible to backport large architectural changes that are made in the service of security. Are you going to backport multiprocess Firefox once that is working?
It is much easier to flip a preference. If you wanted to get sophisticated, you could create an addon that disables all of the preferences you dislike.
- jamespo 12y agoWill setting the about:config option to disable be preserved across browsers with firefox sync?
- reubenmorais 12y agoIt will if there's a corresponding services.sync.prefs.sync.the.pref.you.want.synced.here pref set.
- walterbell 12y ago> you could create an addon that disables all of the preferences you dislike. That's a good idea. Another option is to patch the code to remove the new features, unless Mozilla has taken steps to deter unbundling.
- sp332 12y agoMozilla is very protective of the Firefox trademark. They don't even use it for their own nightly builds, because they want people to associate "Firefox" with stability. So they make it very easy to unbundle.