5 ms·
You assume that such wealth was earned in the first place which is rarely the case and is less so every year. The meritocracy is broken and will be so exactly t
by whybroke 12y ago
You assume that such wealth was earned in the first place which is rarely the case and is less so every year. The meritocracy is broken and will be so exactly to the degree that there is inheritance, the two are directly connected.
Inheritance is the exact definition of anti-meritocracy.
- Thriptic 12y ago> You assume that such wealth was earned in the first place which is rarely the case and is less so every year. Fair point. It's true that my statements only applied to individuals who earned the money themselves, and I failed to consider people who had themselves inherited money.